Compassion vs. Snark
Nov. 25th, 2005 08:56 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A personality trait I have struggled with for a long time is self-righteousness.
Even when I manage to kick myself in the head about one issue, I find myself being rigid and judgemental in another. First, I was a self-righteous fundamentalist Christian. I've been a self-righteous pagan and feminist, and I'm pretty judgemental, now, about those I see as being fuzzy-headed New Agers or head-in-the-sand creationists. I probably skirt the edges of self-righteousness about Size Acceptance and Fat Activism issues as well.
I've been thinking, for a while now, about the ideas of Compassion and snarkiness. I posted a quote more than a year ago from the book "The Hours":
"These days, Clarissa believes, you measure people first by their kindness and their capacity for devotion. You get tired, sometimes, of wit and intellect; everybody's little display of genius."
Don't get me wrong-- I love a good snark. I read dotpolysnark for a giggle quite often. I snark on people in other venues. I understand how fun it is to snark. But sometimes, I see people being snarked (or even downright attacked) who are somewhat socially clueless, but not malevolent. These people would drive you all over town if they found you broken down on the side of the road. They would let you cry on their shoulder when your dog dies. But they say clueless, offensive things sometimes, or do clueless, insensitive things occasionally, and get raked over the coals for it. You don't even have to be actively offensive or insensitive to get snarked, though. Often, people don't get any credit for being basically good at heart if they're not hip, up on the most recent cultural tag lines, and good spellers.
So, anyway, I struggle between the impulse to look down on other people with scorn and the feeling that I need to cultivate more compassion.
I certainly don't believe in some fuzzy, abstract idea that we should never judge people. I also think it's more than fine to point out places where people are not thinking or arguing clearly. I think it's fine to make fun of stupid ideas. I think perhaps the middle ground is to separate people from ideas. "I think that's a stupid idea, but that doesn't make you a lesser human being." It's hard to do, though. I mean, at what point does a person have enough stupid ideas, collectively, that you start to lose respect for them?
Perhaps I just need to start doing some of those Buddhist meditations on compassion and see what my subconcious decides it needs to tell me on how to balance discernment and criticism of bad ideas while still having compassion for flawed human beings (and myself).
Even when I manage to kick myself in the head about one issue, I find myself being rigid and judgemental in another. First, I was a self-righteous fundamentalist Christian. I've been a self-righteous pagan and feminist, and I'm pretty judgemental, now, about those I see as being fuzzy-headed New Agers or head-in-the-sand creationists. I probably skirt the edges of self-righteousness about Size Acceptance and Fat Activism issues as well.
I've been thinking, for a while now, about the ideas of Compassion and snarkiness. I posted a quote more than a year ago from the book "The Hours":
"These days, Clarissa believes, you measure people first by their kindness and their capacity for devotion. You get tired, sometimes, of wit and intellect; everybody's little display of genius."
Don't get me wrong-- I love a good snark. I read dotpolysnark for a giggle quite often. I snark on people in other venues. I understand how fun it is to snark. But sometimes, I see people being snarked (or even downright attacked) who are somewhat socially clueless, but not malevolent. These people would drive you all over town if they found you broken down on the side of the road. They would let you cry on their shoulder when your dog dies. But they say clueless, offensive things sometimes, or do clueless, insensitive things occasionally, and get raked over the coals for it. You don't even have to be actively offensive or insensitive to get snarked, though. Often, people don't get any credit for being basically good at heart if they're not hip, up on the most recent cultural tag lines, and good spellers.
So, anyway, I struggle between the impulse to look down on other people with scorn and the feeling that I need to cultivate more compassion.
I certainly don't believe in some fuzzy, abstract idea that we should never judge people. I also think it's more than fine to point out places where people are not thinking or arguing clearly. I think it's fine to make fun of stupid ideas. I think perhaps the middle ground is to separate people from ideas. "I think that's a stupid idea, but that doesn't make you a lesser human being." It's hard to do, though. I mean, at what point does a person have enough stupid ideas, collectively, that you start to lose respect for them?
Perhaps I just need to start doing some of those Buddhist meditations on compassion and see what my subconcious decides it needs to tell me on how to balance discernment and criticism of bad ideas while still having compassion for flawed human beings (and myself).
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 07:30 am (UTC)To put it mildly. :)
I think the question becomes "does this person have stupid ideas because they are uninformed or do they have stupid ideas despite being having the intellect and knowledge to know better?"
In the first case, I think you should work to separate the person from the idea. For the latter group, I think it is less important.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 09:19 am (UTC)To be honest, I read you for a while before I friended you. You write and look a lot like an ex-roommate of mine, and I had to question why I would want someone back in my life (even if it is only LJ-life here) that is similar to her. I'm always attracted to friends that have intellectual wit/sarcasm/snark because I can let my mind work with them. I'd say I prefer shows like Frasier or Just Shoot Me over the ever popular Sponge Bob Square Pants.
I think having a powerful mind and using it for snarkiness can be an intimidating thing. You have to walk this line between creative-smart-cliquey and intellectually rude/abrasively misunderstood. That said, I am pleased to learn you do a far better job than my ex-roommate, mainly because of your frequent use of tact (completely lost art) and your more realistic sensibilities. It may have to do with the fact that you've been several different places spiritually and intellectually.
It's good that you're aware of where you are and that you can pinpoint your struggle and summarize it in an entry this length.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 11:00 am (UTC)Immediately; I don't see why there would be a threshold to *start*. On the other hand, just because a person has lost *some* respect, that doesn't mean that I don't respect them overall, and willingness to go out on a limb can be worth more than a few ideas that don't work out.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:01 am (UTC)A friend of mine once told me that if someone could use your advise, chances are they would have already done so. The fact they haven't generally points to there being an impediment to doing so. Pointing out their failure will not make them happier and will not solve the problem.
I keep my advise for people I respect and advise boards. If someone really, really wants my help, they will ask for it directly.