![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's just one study, so I'm not taking it as gospel, but it's interesting. And there's good news: you CAN make a difference in pollution by shifting what you eat. We eat no beef or chicken and just a bit of fish (of course environmental issues around fishing are a whole other... um.. kettle of fish...) and I try to eat locally in the summer when it's feasible, but I pretty much feel zero guilt about having fruit from South America in the middle of winter. If you live in the Midwest, it's pretty close to impossible to eat entirely local unless you want to eat venison jerky and canned peaches all winter.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080422-green-food.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080422-green-food.html
Interesting...
Date: 2008-04-23 02:03 pm (UTC)""The local food movement did not develop because of concerns about climate and greenhouse gas emissions," Morris said...It developed because people don't trust multinational companies," he said. "They have a desire to know the supplier [of their food]...The whole idea behind locavores is to try to create a market behind people farming the way we prefer and a distribution system for small-scale farms," Van Wing said."
That's why I try to eat local--to support a local and (in my mind) more sustainable food economy that doesn't shut out the small farmer. Plus it's fresher and more nutrient rich.
Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:Re: Interesting...
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-23 02:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 04:27 am (UTC)(I don't spend a whole lot of mental effort on trying to eat local, but I don't approve of downplaying the environmental benefits of doing so. And besides, global warming is not the only environmental ill.)
(no subject)
From: