yep. This paper, while in tune with many of the conclusions I've seen elsewhere, has an extremely small sample (less than 2000 deaths to correlate with anything) for the number of variables it was tracking.
That said, I'd be very interested in seeing their results again in a few years, if they're continuing to track the same (larger) population of women who haven't died as of the publication of that study....
And (small whine here) I can't access the full text of that article via my UM library access. They apparently don't subscribe. :-/ (I could almost certainly get a dead-tree copy - I'm just not that motivated).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-02-23 06:29 pm (UTC)That said, I'd be very interested in seeing their results again in a few years, if they're continuing to track the same (larger) population of women who haven't died as of the publication of that study....
And (small whine here) I can't access the full text of that article via my UM library access. They apparently don't subscribe. :-/ (I could almost certainly get a dead-tree copy - I'm just not that motivated).