Aug. 25th, 2005

sarahmichigan: (Default)
My latest Skeptical Enquirer has an analysis of the so-called "obesity epidemic." Along the way, they examine some contradictory evidence and debunk some claims about certain food and drink that are supposed to be so great for you (i.e. green tea and red wine).

I also like the fact that they say that the fact that the CDC corrected their numbers on the so-called obesity epidemic is points in their favor because science is supposed to be self-correcting. "Science is about provisional truths that can be changed when evidence indicates that they should be."

Quotes from the last two paragraphs sum up how I feel about the "war on obesity" pretty well:

"The evidence still shows that morbid obesity is associated with an increased likelihood of developing disease and suffering from early mortality, but it also shows that those who are a few pounds overweight don't need to panic. What's more, it is clear that everyone, fat or thin, will benefit from regular exercise regardless of whether they lose weight.

The lesson to be learned from this controversy is that rational moderation is in order."

more about the CDC revising its figures here:

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/04-19-2005/0003436025&EDATE=

May 2023

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 09:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios