Buying local is not as green as you'd think

[sarahmichigan]

 It's just one study, so I'm not taking it as gospel, but it's interesting. And there's good news: you CAN make a difference in pollution by shifting what you eat. We eat no beef or chicken and just a bit of fish (of course environmental issues around fishing are a whole other... um.. kettle of fish...) and I try to eat locally in the summer when it's feasible, but I pretty much feel zero guilt about having fruit from South America in the middle of winter. If you live in the Midwest, it's pretty close to impossible to eat entirely local unless you want to eat venison jerky and canned peaches all winter.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080422-green-food.html

Comments

Re: Interesting...

[lilpeace.livejournal.com]

Exactly. Knowing what I know about commercial meat production, I will do my best to never eat it again.

Re: Interesting...

[sarahmichigan.livejournal.com]

Yes, that's one reason I only eat fish and no chicken or beef. Not even taking into account animal cruelty, factory farming just so bad for the environment. (And I can't eat pig knowing how intelligent they are.)

I'm somewhat conflicted even about eating fish because there are issues with both over-fishing wild fish and environmental problems with fish farming.

Re: Interesting...

[pstscrpt.livejournal.com]

I can't eat pig knowing how intelligent they are.
The only thing I really put in that category is octopus.

environmental problems with fish farming
It depends how they do it, and to a large degree on the fish. A few places have started experimenting with inland salmon farming, which avoids the problems of disease from overcrowded farmed fish getting into the wild population (but not that the salmon is still fed wild fish -- or that salmon taste like hell, for that matter). Farm-raised tilapia and catfish can be fed mostly plant diets, so they don't have nearly as much impact as carnivorous fish.