ext_124728 ([identity profile] sarahmichigan.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sarahmichigan 2008-01-07 06:56 pm (UTC)

OK, that all makes sense. I did know most of that already.

My original point, though, was that 0.1 on Shermer's scale is pretty much "morally neutral." It's been a while, so I don't remember his exact scale, but for some reason, I'm fairly sure that morally neutral wasn't zero but rather a very small number, and that was actually what I was trying to convey with calling EC 0.1 immoral.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting