ext_6846 ([identity profile] guttaperk.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sarahmichigan 2007-08-08 05:09 pm (UTC)

Re: Tiresome

I do agree with some of what you are saying. Particularly, I don't think that legislation could ever be enough on its own.

But,
"I think the answer is everyone faces the same standard and [performs] according to their ability."

Given that studies have repeatedly shown that America still viciously discriminates against darker-skinned peoples; and given that people show no propensity to change that discrimination in the absence of strong social forces, including-but-not-limited-to-legislation, how do you recommend that change be brought about?

I was serious when I said that AA and similar measures were sucky but superior to the alternatives. If you don't like them, what do you propose?

I should note that, given my view of the problem, I don't accept "Leave it alone and hope it sorts itself out" as a viable solution practically or an acceptable one ethically.

I suspect that we are also working with different understandings of AA and its results. I've heard a common mythology that AA leads to priviliged, underskilled minority workers holding posts that they don't deserve, over ousted, capable white people- victims of 'reverse racism'. I've never seen this substantiated by fact.

All the fact I've seen on the matter suggests that "reverse racism" is like peeing into a hurricane. It may exist, but focussing on it constitutes a grave error given the context, and even trying to do it is dangerous in the attempt.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting